Episode 2041 · 7am
“Nerd Reich”: Are big tech billionaires at war with democracy?
10 Sep 2026 · 18 min
Episode 2041 · 7am
10 Sep 2026 · 18 min
When Donald Trump was sworn in for a second time, some of the most powerful men in the tech world had the best seats in the room. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg – a display of just how close silicon valley had aligned itself to the administration. But within that world, journalist Gil Durán says, is a smaller, more radical group with a much bigger ambition: get rid of democracy, and use technology to build a new order in its place, controlled by a wealthy elite. And in his new book, The Nerd Reich , Gil traces how these once-fringe ideas have moved closer to the White…
Speaker 1:When Donald Trump was sworn in for a second time, some of the most powerful men in the tech world had the best seats in the room.
Speaker 2:Ladies and gentlemen, the President-elect of the United States, the Honourable Donald John Trump.
Speaker 1:Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, a display of just how close Silicon Valley had aligned itself to the administration.
Speaker 3:From this moment on, America's decline is over.
Speaker 1:But within that world, journalist Gil Duran says, is a smaller, more radical group with a much bigger ambition. Get rid of democracy and use technology to build a new order in its place, controlled by a wealthy elite. And in his new book, The Nerd Reich, Gil traces how these once fringe ideas have moved closer to the White House than ever before. I'm Ruby Jones, and you're listening to 7am. Today, Silicon Valley journalist and author Gil Duran on the group he's dubbed the Nerd Reich, the ideas driving them and how they became part of Trump's political project. It's Friday, September 11. Gil, the claim at the heart of your book is a big one, that a small group of tech billionaires don't just want more influence over democracy. They actually want to make democracy obsolete. What convinced you that that idea was actually a coherent political project?
Speaker 4:A lot of my book is told in the words of the men that I write about. They give long interviews. They give speeches. They write long blog posts. They fund writers and movements. And so what my book does is expose how over a period of decades now, this small cult of Silicon Valley billionaires with apocalyptic ideas has fantasized about the end of American democracy and bringing about some kind of new tech regime to rule the country, if not the world and the universe. And during this Trump administration, Trump's return to power, the same group of people has not only cornered the Trump administration and become a major funder and supporter of Donald Trump, especially the crypto industry, has now become the major funder of right-wing politics in our country. But these same people are also cornering AI, crypto, defense technology, surveillance. And so my book is about how they have bundled together all of these different institutions and sectors of power and are aligning behind Donald Trump at a moment when he is threatening to destroy the American democratic experiment. And so I felt that what they have
Speaker 4:been talking about for years is what they're now clearly doing. And I felt that people should at least entertain the idea that they are doing what they've been talking about doing.
Speaker 5:Okay.
Speaker 1:So this cult of Silicon Valley billionaires, tell me more about who you're talking about there and what it is that unites them.
Speaker 4:At the center of all this is Peter Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal and Palantir, who's been a big Trump supporter for a very long time.
Speaker 2:I'm not a politician, but neither is Donald Trump. He is a builder, and it's time to rebuild America.
Speaker 4:And he was greatly inspired by a 1997 book called The Sovereign Individual. And it predicted that in the 21st century, technology would render democracy obsolete and that nation states like the United States and the United Kingdom would crumble. And there would be a new world order in which these rootless, wealthy elites who had invested wisely and prepared for the collapse would now roam free as sovereign individuals and to different jurisdictions that would now cater to their whims because everybody would be competing for a slice of this gazillionaire bonanza money that they would spread around the world.
Speaker 2:You could actually unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through technological means. And this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics.
Speaker 4:And it was a kooky, crazy, apocalyptic thesis back in 1997. The book was poorly reviewed. It was not a bestseller. It was dismissed as an apocalyptic exercise that is not convincing. But this book so impressed Peter Thiel that he has credited it with being part of the inspiration for PayPal, which he saw as an effort to get ahead of this coming digital currency that would change the entire world. And so my book really looks at how Thiel goes on to become a multimillionaire and then a billionaire and then fund writers like Curtis Yarvin. Democracy is the rule of the many.
Speaker 2:Oligarchy is the rule of the few.
Speaker 6:And monarchy is the rule of one. I'm happy to be a monarchist.
Speaker 4:Curtis Jarvin was this fascist blogger, anonymous for a long time, who argued that American democracy was an obsolete form of software that needed to be upgraded to dictatorship. He wrote that the federal government should be purged by a future president who would act as a dictator and fire civil servants en masse. And we saw these ideas realized under Doge.
Speaker 6:Anything that works.
Speaker 3:Is a monarchy.
Speaker 4:People like Balaji Sreenivasan.
Speaker 6:Now what we can do is actually rebuild democracy internet first.
Speaker 5:We've done it for capitalism with crypto.
Speaker 1:Now I think we'll do it with democracy.
Speaker 4:This sort of cabal of billionaires around Peter Thiel for the past 25 or 30 years is rises to unprecedented levels of power and wealth in the United States and are now the animating force behind much of what Trump is doing in Washington. So in my view, these things have become very real and we have to take them seriously. And I think that's the difference between me and a lot of other journalists in my country is that I'm listening very closely to what these guys say, and I feel like we should take them very seriously.
Speaker 1:And so for many years, those ideas that you're talking about, they existed on obscure blogs, talked about in Silicon Valley circles. Tell me more about how they actually made their way to the White House. How did someone like Thiel gain traction and influence?
Speaker 4:Well, first of all, he has a lot of money. And in the United States, you can buy influence and power. And Thiel has spread his money around to both Democrats and and Republicans, while his major surveillance technology company, Palantir, has become a massive government contractor all throughout our military and our intelligence agencies and our law enforcement agencies and our hospitals and our businesses. So Palantir has become quite sweeping throughout our society. And what he did was fund different thinkers and writers who agreed with his ideas and promoted them. And so what happens is this thing goes from being a fringe weirdo ideology into the mainstream of the Republican Party. And perhaps there's no better way to understand that than by examining the role of J.D.
Speaker 7:Vance.
Speaker 1:So Thiel quite famously has close ties to Vance.
Speaker 4:You can put it that way, definitely. I like to say that J.D. Vance is almost entirely a creation of Peter Thiel. If you look at the last 15 or so years of Vance's life since Yale Law School, he has been promoted and funded by Peter Thiel.
Speaker 6:You know, he's always been a friend of mine. He's always been one of the smartest people I've ever met.
Speaker 8:Oh, really?
Speaker 6:Just a very thoughtful dude. But he's literally never asked me once for anything.
Speaker 5:So he just believed in you?
Speaker 6:He believed in me. He agreed with me on a lot of issues.
Speaker 4:Vance decided not to be a lawyer after law school because he was inspired by a speech that Peter Thiel gave. He went out to Silicon Valley and became a venture capitalist, a mediocre venture capitalist at a venture fund founded by Peter Thiel. When he ran for Senate, it was with unprecedented amounts of money from Peter Thiel. And when it was time to think about trying to get on the vice presidential ticket with Donald Trump, J.D. Vance had a big problem, which was that he had previously called Trump America's Hitler. And it was Peter Thiel and his fellow venture capitalists who made the peace and got Vance on the ticket. And what's worse is that back in 2021, when Vance was running for Senate, He gave an interview in which he quoted the ideas of Curtis Jarvin, specifically the idea that the government, the U.S. government should be purged or denazified and that President Trump, he predicted Trump would return to power in 2024 and that Trump should defy the law and challenge the justices to force him to follow the law. And this is crazy anti-American, anti-constitutional stuff.
Speaker 4:And as a Yale educated lawyer, Vance certainly knows that. But these were the ideas of Curtis Jarvin and J.D. Vance said so. So here's Here's a guy who's quoting Curtis Yarvin, who's been created by Peter Thiel and is a heartbeat away from the presidency.
Speaker 1:Still to come, the project to create billionaire cities around the world. How should we think about who is influencing who here? Because I remember particularly around the time of Trump's inauguration in 2025, people were watching on as those tech CEOs sat behind Trump and thought that they were really being forced to sort of kiss the ring.
Speaker 3:Our goal is to lead a sweeping transformation of the federal government's technology that will deliver dramatically better services for citizens, stronger protection, From cyber attacks.
Speaker 1:But do you think that we're looking at that relationship backwards? Is Trump deferring to them now?
Speaker 4:It's a partnership of sorts. The best way to look at that is Donald Trump used to call crypto a scam. And on the day he returned to the White House, he became a crypto billionaire. And basically, the Trump family is now... Acting like venture capitalists, opening their own firms, opening their own tech companies. So basically Donald Trump has been bought off and is going along with a lot of this stuff because that's what he is in business to do as president, to cash in. And I don't think it's all of the Silicon Valley billionaires who are so deep into this ideology. I think there's a core of them who are very dedicated to the collapse of democracy and see it as their destiny. The rest of the billionaires are just cowards who will go along with whatever happens and say nothing against the government or against their fellow billionaires. And I think that's what we're seeing.
Speaker 4:I think cowardice is the main element here from people like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos. They share the same hopes, I think, of having themselves celebrated and as the kings of the universe and of humanity. But I don't think they're the zealous core. I think they're followers and they're cowards, and their silence is a form of complicity, but it's not leadership.
Speaker 1:And at the most radical end of this, at the zealous core, some of these figures talk about not only wanting to take control of or collapsing existing governments, they talk about creating these entirely new network states, so privately governed cities and and even countries that are funded by billionaires. Is that a project that we should think about seriously?
Speaker 4:Without a doubt. Keep an eye on the plan to build billionaire cities all over the world. We see it happening in real time. There's a prototype already in Honduras called Prospera, where a group of billionaires bought a piece of an island and negotiated with a corrupt government to give them partial sovereignty over regulations and laws.
Speaker 5:Prospera Incorporated provides investors an opportunity to accelerate the city's growth. and participate in the upside. Prospera is building the future of human governance, privately run and for profit.
Speaker 4:In addition, in his 2024 campaign plan, Donald Trump announced a plan for something called Freedom Cities, which would be 10 new major American cities built on federal land after a competition where different corporations would forward their best proposals and Donald Trump, in true game show fashion, would pick the winners.
Speaker 8:These Freedom Cities will reopen the frontier, reignite American imagination, and give hundreds of thousands of young people and other people, all hardworking families, a new shot at homeownership And in fact, the American dream.
Speaker 4:And the other place we see this idea of building these new tech cities popping up is in Gaza, where Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is part of a proposal to build a new tech utopia city on the ruins of Gaza.
Speaker 2:In Gaza's waterfront property, it could be very valuable to, if people would focus on kind of building up, you know, livelihoods.
Speaker 5:You think about all the money that's gone into this.
Speaker 4:Last year, Trump tweeted out a photo of an AI generated future Gaza with a big Trump casino and resort on the beach.
Speaker 3:I don't want to be a wise guy, but the Riviera of the Middle East, this could be something that could be so bad. This could be so magnificent.
Speaker 4:In Greenland, which Donald Trump keeps threatening to steal, there's a proposal to build a new tech city there called Praxis, again, funded by the same group of people, Andreessen and Thiel and others. And other billionaires are now openly proposing building new cities in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in Venezuela. in El Salvador, and there are currently plans to build a crypto megacity in Kazakhstan. So suddenly, there's all this need to build these big new venture capital funded cities, but nobody seems very interested in explaining why that is. My book explains why that is.
Speaker 1:And here in Australia, Palantir has a significant foothold. Our government has spent tens of millions of dollars on its technology. So what safeguards should governments like Australia's be demanding when it comes to to working closely with companies like this?
Speaker 4:I don't think any democratic government should work with any company whose leaders do not support democracy and speak quite openly against it. Palantir is pretty militantly fascist at this point, if you read Alex Karp's manifesto. which called for Silicon Valley to partner with the military and sort of go to war against inferior cultures, whatever that means, called for national service to be compulsory. I tweeted about the Palantir Manifesto in April and got permanently banned from Twitter as a result. So it's not clear to me why a company whose leadership is has such extreme ideas would be allowed into the most sensitive parts of our government, our military, and our intelligence agencies. It seems to me like a massive failure of intelligence agencies around the world. Either they completely missed it or they kind of like it and are complicit in it.
Speaker 1:And you end your book calling for some aggressive measures, breaking up the technopolies, tougher AI regulation, even banning crypto. Do you think that those measures are possible? And where would you start?
Speaker 4:Well, anything is possible. The billionaires are imagining a future where they don't even live on this planet anymore and where they defeat death and conquer the universe. If you go deeper into this ideology, and I write about this in my book, this is all rooted in this very apocalyptic sort of religious view that technology, especially AI, is about to create a godlike powers for a handful of people. And so while some of these ideas seem far-fetched in the moment, I think we're living through a time where the extremism and the radicalization of the billionaire class has become a real threat to everyone's livelihood and safety. If the United States makes it out of this terrible predicament, a big if, then we have to reckon with the fact that the billionaire class betrayed us and tried to destroy our country and take our freedoms. And we are not only entitled to vengeance, it is a moral responsibility that we make sure this never happens again. We can have billionaires or we can have democracy. We can't have both.
Speaker 1:Gil, thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 4:Thank you.
Speaker 7:Also in the news... The federal government is set to introduce new laws to crack down on Australia's illegal tobacco trade. The changes will target organised crime groups, distributors and shops selling black market cigarettes, and allow things like suspiciously cheap prices or illegal packaging to be used as evidence tobacco was unlawfully imported. Labor has ruled out the Coalition's proposal to cut the tobacco excise by 80% to make the black market less lucrative, arguing stronger enforcement is the better way to tackle the problem. And the Greens have agreed to support a controversial carbon credit scheme that could help fund New South Wales' Great Koala National Park. The New South Wales Labor government plans to stop logging across 176,000 hectares of native forest. But critics say the government had already committed to protect the park and shouldn't get credits that allow polluters to keep emitting. The Greens secured changes in return for their support, including restrictions on coal and gas companies using the credits. But the decision has split the parties. with three senators planning to cross the floor
Speaker 7:and vote against it. I'm Daniel James. Thanks for listening to 7am. We'll be back tomorrow.
Transcript supplied by the publisher with the episode.
E2044 · 13 Sep 2026 · 19 min
One by one, the Aboriginal leaders, organisations and watchdogs the Northern Territory government is supposed to work with are walking away. The Children’s Commissioner has resigned. An Indigenous MP has left parliament after more than a decade. And now almost the entire Aboriginal side of the Territory’s Justice Policy Partnership has suspended its involvement. They’re all making a remarkably similar complaint – that the government isn’t listening, and that the structures supposedly designed to give Aboriginal people a say have become meaningless. Today,…
E2043 · 12 Sep 2026 · 31 min
From afar, Alice Springs is a whirlpool of myth and truth. A town with competing interests and few solutions, marked by chaos and decades of government overreach. In cities and towns across Australia, we read about a “crisis” about “rampages”. One newspaper described the children of Alice Springs as “tiny menaces stuck on a turnstile of trouble”. In this first episode of our three part series This is Alice Springs , Daniel James visits the town at the heart of our nation, to find out how all the interventions, big and small, by governments of all…
E2042 · 11 Sep 2026 · 15 min
In 2020 Anthony Albanese called for the sacking of then-sports minister Bridget McKenzie over her involvement in the infamous sports rorts – which he labelled a farce. Not long after, she resigned. But now that similar pork barrelling claims have been levelled at the Prime Minister, he’s come out swinging – refusing to admit any wrong-doing over his failure to declare membership at a golf club which received a six million dollar grant. Also coming out swinging this week was Andrew Hastie. The Liberal MP delivered a masterclass in how to take on One Nation as he labelled…
E2040 · 9 Sep 2026 · 14 min
Last month, an emotional Jacqui Lambie revealed a private health battle connected to her time in the army – a debilitating prolapse that required surgery. The Tasmanian senator called out gaps in health care services for female veterans, and raged against the government’s plans to introduce a $5,000 cap on allied health services for veterans. This week fellow veterans joined her calls, laying down their war medals outside parliament house in protest, as Lambie promised to continue the fight. Today, Senator Jacqui Lambie on why veterans are getting a raw deal. If you enjoy 7am ,…
E2039 · 8 Sep 2026 · 16 min
One Nation is copping heat for a proposal that would let Australians take some of the money going into their super as extra pay instead. For up to three years, renters and mortgage holders could choose to take home a quarter of the money that would normally be put into their retirement – worth about $44 a week for someone on the average full-time wage. At the same time, the Coalition has been looking at its own ways to give people greater access to their super now – and some of its MPs want to go further. So why is superannuation suddenly being pitched as an answer to…
E2038 · 7 Sep 2026 · 16 min
In imposing scenes in the UK over the weekend, hundreds of masked men belonging to the hard-right group Patriot Platform stopped traffic. Around the same time, political party AfD was making history in Germany – becoming the first far-right party to win in the country since World War two. And on the other side of the world, Australia’s high court will today hear from our most high profile Neo-Nazi group in a challenge, legal experts say could see the federal government’s ban on White Australia (formerly known as the National Socialist Network) overturned. Today, Associate…
E2056 · 25 Sep 2026 · 19 min
For decades, liberal democracy came with a promise: that with each generation we would become freer, wealthier, and have more control over our lives. But after years of economic shocks, war and political upheaval, more and more people seem to have stopped believing that promise. And in its place, we’re seeing political movements emerge that don’t just want different policies – they’re questioning some of the fundamental ideas our democracies were built on. In his new Quarterly Essay, Time of Monsters , writer and broadcaster Waleed Aly argues this is part of something…
E2055 · 24 Sep 2026 · 17 min
For years, Donald Trump’s attacks on the media were treated as part of the spectacle of his politics. Now, three major news organisations have had their White House passes revoked – and Trump says others could follow. Here in Australia, we’re seeing Pauline Hanson follow the same playbook – with One Nation repeatedly deciding which news organisations can attend its press conferences. But unlike America, press freedom in Australia has remarkably few legal protections backing it. So what happens when politicians stop respecting the rules we’ve simply assumed they…
E2054 · 23 Sep 2026 · 16 min
It’s an uncomfortable fact our government doesn’t like to face: 25 years on from the Tampa affair, we’re still paying a tiny island micro-nation hundreds of millions of dollars to keep immigration detention alive. One of the ways we’re doing that is by helping to prop up Nauru Airlines – a company riven with financial, governance and safety issues. Today, independent journalist Nick Feik on how our relationship with a foreign commercial airline is compromising the Australian government’s own regulators, departments and procurement processes in the name of…
E2053 · 22 Sep 2026 · 16 min
One of the defining themes of Donald Trump's presidencies has been his war against the media. Last week, he banned journalists from three media outlets from the White House, saying he’s had enough of the negative stories about him. This week, those outlets sued him over the ban. And just last year he proved no one’s off limits, taking media mogul Rupert Murdoch to court in a ten-billion-dollar lawsuit that’s still playing out – all over another story he didn’t much like. Today, journalist and author Gabriel Sherman on the battle of the titans between Donald…