Skip to content
Melo Podcasts Home
CategoriesLanguagesFollowing

Season 7, Episode 1 · Quality during Design

Why Do We Jump? About the Moment Before We Commit

10 Sep 2026 · 6 min

Play episode WhatsApp Download

Episode notes

When a project goes off track, we usually look back and say, “We didn’t define the problem, and we jumped.” That sounds like a process breakdown, as if one good checklist or gate approval would have prevented it. But design fog runs deeper than missing process. It’s what’s happening in us. Over the next few episodes on Quality During Design, we’re exploring a quieter question: When we jump to a solution, why? Before we understand the problem, we start building. We skip questioning and inve...

Chapters

Tap a chapter to play from there.

Transcript

Read the transcript · about 840 words, follows along as you listen

Dianna:Design fog isn't a single thing. When we talk about it, we usually mean we didn't define the problem and we jumped. That sounds like a process breakdown, like one good checklist would fix it, but the fog runs deeper than the process. It's also what's happening in us. The next few episodes are going to be an arc where we explore a quieter question. When we jump to a solution, why? Not what's missing in our process, what's happening in us? The answers aren't one thing.

Dianna:There are several. We're zooming in on three of them, three that live in how we think. There are other reasons we jump, how we run and rush team meetings, how information gets lost in the handoff, the assumptions we never stop to examine. Those live and pierce the design fog. This arc is about the three internal engines Here's the thing that makes it worth our time to study this. The fix isn't just see it and willpower. Deliberate structures can help us hold the not knowing instead of jumping.

Dianna:A structure can help us train the reflex. Let me introduce this arc a little more after the brief introduction. Design fog is what happens when we cross from the problem space into the solution space too early. Before we understand the problem, we start building. We skip the questioning and investigating, jump the peak of the diamond, and reach for a solution that feels like progress, but is really a shield. It's the ta-da flop waiting to happen.

Dianna:Check out the blog post associated with this episode, and I'll attach an informational graphic that best describes this. So that's the design fog and jumping too early. Now, what the anti-jump looks like is that we're staying in the fog on purpose. We're holding the not knowing so we can question and investigate before we build. That's not stalling. That's where the good design inputs come from Here's the thing about the jump. It doesn't feel like failure in the moment.

Dianna:It feels like progress. That's what makes it hard to resist. So then why do we jump? The FOG has more than one engine We're going to be covering three. One engine is speed. It is easier than ever before to start building things and to build them cheaply. We have digital twins, we have AI, we have additive manufacturing and cheaper prototyping. When the building gets cheap, the jumping gets easier. Another engine is certainty. When we're sure we already know, we stop checking and we just move forward.

Dianna:This is also a problem in classical problem-solving. If we don't properly define the problem, we may miss out on the root cause or the real solution to it. And the third engine runs deeper And the third engine is the deeper one running underneath the other two. We're going to be covering these engines in one arc. So one arc, three different faces or engines. This episode is a map, and the upcoming guests to the show are going to fill in the stops Now, there's a reason that I'm starting this arc with an introductory episode, because naming the faces now means each upcoming conversation lands inside a framework that we're already in.

Dianna:They're not a random guest. We're building one idea with a pattern spotting approach. And in this arc, I'll keep pointing you to one place to practice it: pierce the design fog. Because the reflex may be human, but the way we train against it can be structural In the upcoming episode that releases in a couple weeks, Ashley Roach joins us to talk about speed. He talks about when making building things cheap and fast, the hard part stops being can we build it and becomes should I stop tweaking and put it in front of real users?

Dianna:He'll show us the trap of falling in love with a prototype, the loop of I could just tweak this one thing, and he gives a way through it, the one-way, two-way door, the test for whether a decision is safe to ship and learn from. Then another guest is going to be joining us to talk about certainty. When we're confident we already know the customer and problem, we may commit before we check. And if speed is the tool and certainty is the excuse, what's underneath both?

Dianna:Why is the fog so hard to sit in? There's a reason, and the most human one, and it's the last conversation of this arc So I ask you to subscribe to the podcast so you'll get each new episode as it drops I'll leave you with a quick question. When you catch yourself jumping this week, don't judge it. Just ask,"Did I jump because it was easy to build or because I was certain I already knew?" Start there, and then we'll add the third question over this arc.

Dianna:I look forward to exploring this topic with you This has been a production of Deeney Enterprises. Thanks for listening

Transcript supplied by the publisher with the episode.

Podcast

Quality during Design

Dianna Deeney · Business · English

Quality during Design is the podcast for engineers and product developers navigating the messy front end of product development. Each episode gives you practical quality and reliability tools you can use during the design phase — so your team catches problems early, avoids costly rework, and ships p

More from Quality during Design All episodes →

  1. S7 · E3 · 8 Oct 2026 · 10 min

    Two Ways We Jump: Speed and Certainty

    In this solo episode of Quality during Design, Dianna looks at two reasons product development teams jump from a partial understanding of a problem to a committed solution: speed and certainty. Fast prototyping, generative AI, and 3D printing can make building feel harmless, but activity only creates value when it answers a specific question and informs a decision. Certainty can create the same design fog more slowly, when familiar customers, old requirements, or past successes ar...

  2. S7 · E2 · 24 Sep 2026 · 37 min

    When Building Gets Cheap, Decisions Matter More, with Ashley Roach

    Fast prototyping changes the constraint. When software, AI tools, and other rapid-prototyping methods make it inexpensive to turn an idea into something testable, the challenge is no longer only Can we build it? The harder questions become: What should we build? Who is it for?What evidence do we need?When should we stop tweaking and get it in front of people?Which decisions are reversible—and which ones will lock in future choices?In this episode, Ashley Roach and I discuss how speed can hel...

  3. S3 · E23 · 27 Aug 2026 · 41 min

    The Cracks Between Good Designs, with Mike Fedorov (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

    Why do well-designed initiatives keep coming apart when they reach reality? Mike Fedorov, who spent 26 years in supply chain and operations at Mars and Accenture and now co-leads Applied AI Labs, explains that the failure usually isn’t a bad call inside a single design. It’s the coordination layer: the seams between teams, systems, and the data that no one remembers how to work. He walks through a transformation that stalled for months, what AI can actually do to close the gap, an...

  4. S6 · E24 · 13 Aug 2026 · 15 min

    Decision Room Carry: Why Your Best Decisions Disappear on Monday

    A cross-functional team can make what seems like a solid Friday decision, captured in minutes and agreed to in the room. Only then nothing moves on Monday. Drawing on Agnes Carroll’s observation that “no one is carrying it,” the episode argues this decision room carry problem isn’t solved by better documentation or tools like Jira and decision matrices, because an assigned decision is not an authored one. The gap is cognitive: the people who must execute weren’t reasoning, stress-...

  5. S6 · E23 · 23 Jul 2026 · 20 min

    From Tools to Teamwork — 200 Episodes of Rethinking Quality during Design

    In this milestone episode, Dianna reflects on how the thinking evolved from quality methods to product development processes, to team dynamics, and ultimately to one central idea: Quality during Design happens when teams align early and think together intentionally. In this episode The question that has guided all 200 episodes Why good engineering teams still build products that miss the mark The evolution from tools → process → people → systems The "Des...

  6. S3 · E22 · 9 Jul 2026 · 39 min

    Influence Without the Title, with Jenny Wanger (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

    Why do product teams stay misaligned? Jenny Wanger explains the structural problems: efficiency-focused handoff workflows, unclear strategy, and people left cleaning up decisions they didn't help make. She shares tested practices for influencing upstream decisions without formal authority: clarifying strategy through curiosity, bringing the right people in early (pre-mortems work), and publicly recognizing collaborators. Key Takeaways Fire drills and half-finished features often stem from los...

  7. S3 · E21 · 25 Jun 2026 · 33 min

    What Are You Really Trying to Learn? Chad Schneider on Prototyping with Purpose (A Chat with Cross-Functional Experts)

    The episode features Chad Schneider, CEO and founder of Root3 Labs, discussing prototyping as a discipline focused on answering specific questions to reduce technical, schedule, and market risk. He explains that prototypes need not resemble the final product, citing examples like using a cardboard mockup to verify hand access for connectors and 3D-printed sizing models to understand surgical constraints. Chad describes managing complex, time-constrained projects by rigorously eval...

Take it with you

The Melo app keeps playing with the screen off, works in the car and on your watch, wakes you to your station, and browses the whole catalogue offline. Free, no ads, no account.

Get it on Google Play