Skip to content
Melo Podcasts Home
CategoriesLanguagesFollowing

Episode · Summation with Auren Hoffman

Axios Co-founder Roy Schwartz: why average is worthless now

6 Oct 2026 · 43 min

Play episode WhatsApp Download

Episode notes

Roy Schwartz co-founded Axios, the news company known for smart brevity, and helped grow it to a $525 million sale to Cox Enterprises. He's now co-founder and CEO of Axios HQ, an AI-powered internal communications platform spun out of Axios. He co-wrote Smart Brevity, and his new book is Simplify. Before Axios, he was chief revenue officer of Politico. In this episode of Summation, Roy and Auren discuss: Meeting bankruptcy: wiping every recurring meeting off the calendar twice a yearAI as a c...

Transcript

Read the transcript · about 9,170 words, follows along as you listen

SPEAKER_01:My favorite thing is when I connected AI to my calendar and to my email. Why is Google not able to do that? I think they're too big to be able to fix that specific topic.

SPEAKER_00:My guest today is Roy Schwartz. Roy co-founded Axios, the news company known for smart brevity and helped grow it to a$525 million exit.

SPEAKER_01:That problem, by the way, that we're talking about probably doesn't matter to it's not on their radar right now. Like the biggest thing on their radar, which is by the way, going to be the biggest topic for the next, I don't know, year, is gonna be search is dead, right? Websites are dead.

SPEAKER_00:Hello, fellow data nerds. My guest today is Roy Schwartz. Roy co-founded Axios, the news company known for smart brevity and helped grow it to a$525 million exit to Cox Enterprises. He's now the co-founder and CEO of Axios HQ, an AI-powered internal communications platform that was spun out of Axios. And he co-wrote the book Smart Brevity. And he's got a new book, Simplify, which is out this month. Before all that, he was chief revenue officer of Politico.

SPEAKER_00:We're also good friends. Roy, welcome to Summation. All right. Thanks for having me on. I'm excited to do this. I'm super excited as well. Now, you kind of like built a whole company on Axios with kind of this the idea that everyone writes too much. Why is being brief so hard and why is everyone's default so long?

SPEAKER_01:It goes back to school. Like you remember when you were in high school and you had to write an essay and they force you to do three, four pages, five thousand woods, you'd play with the margin spray. Yeah, you'd like try and like do all this stuff. So you'd have to write less. The issue is that they really put the depth with length. That's the issue. And so it's sort of ingrained in us from school. Same thing, by the way, in journalism, right? Like, oh, if you can write a long piece, you must really know your stuff.

SPEAKER_01:But it really takes a lot, as you know, to be concise. Like writing in smart brevity is actually takes longer. It takes a lot more thinking in order to figure out, well, we're doing the work for the audience. So how do I make sure, Aaron, that you can get in and out as quickly as possible? And it's just something that for whatever reason, it's a human glitch. We tend to sit down in front of a keyboard and just vomit words.

SPEAKER_00:There's like a famous Mark Twain quote that goes, you know, something like, I would have wrote a shorter letter if I had more time, or something like that. Super accurate. My pet peeve with podcasts is that there's all these podcasts that are like three, four, five hours long, and they're with super interesting guests, but they definitely could have been an hour. And also books are like that too. I just read this, or I just tried to read this book about George Schultz, who I'm like fascinated with.

SPEAKER_00:And so it's like super long biography, and it was just terrible. It was just like so long and so hard to get through. I would have just appreciated a book that was like one third or one-fourth as long.

SPEAKER_01:Well, look, we we were very careful with the wording, right? It's it's not brief. Brevity is as short as it needs to be to convey the information that you need. And so it doesn't help us if it's just the Cliff Notes version and you don't get the substance that you need.

SPEAKER_00:And sometimes the anecdotes, which are the are actually the really important thing to get out of it.

SPEAKER_01:There hasn't been a document yet that we've not been able to apply smart brevity to and at least reduced to a certain length. But we've done it even for uh the the one that I always bring up is BP safety oil rig information. Uh so they used to have this really thick document that everyone had to read before they would get on the oil rigs. And of course, nobody wanted to read them. We went in there, helped put it into smart brevity. Those things then had to be, you know, approved by legal, and you know, there's all these compliance issues.

SPEAKER_01:But nearly anything can be more concise than it is.

SPEAKER_00:Yeah, like that uh that airline safety video that we all watch. I mean, like that could definitely be like 30 seconds or something. Yes, exactly. Like here the end squeaks, here are the here's how you do the seepout, the masks. Okay, let's take off. Like, let's do this.

SPEAKER_01:I don't understand why they want it to be this like art project every time you see them. They're getting longer than the other.

SPEAKER_00:Kevin Hart is like on there, like showing me his thing. I'm like, I like Kevin Hart, but like, why do I need to see him in this video?

SPEAKER_01:Yeah, yeah, exactly.

SPEAKER_00:All right, now you're you're dyslexic. I assume like smart brevity is even more important for people that are dyslexic or process information dis uh differently.

SPEAKER_01:Yeah. So you know, I I noticed this when I was in meetings. I would, if there was a lot of information being served or a really difficult to understand presentation, I would actually like say, Oh, can you go back? Hold on. I want to make sure I understand this. I would summarize that slide. And uh before long, I realized this is actually a superpower of mine. Like I can, I can actually go in, I can understand a lot of dense, thick information, and my brain has to simplify it.

SPEAKER_01:I don't, I don't have a choice. I have to simplify it. Other people came up to me like, oh, I'm so glad you you paused there or you stopped or you summarized it. Like that was super helpful. And ultimately a big chunk of that led to what we did with with smart brevity. But what was really interesting is after we launched Smart Brevity, we would get letters back. I still get these, by the way, where people say, I'm so glad because now I understand why someone sent this to me.

SPEAKER_01:You know, and it's not just people with dyslexia or learning differences, it's even people where English is a second language. Where an example of that was I remember we got notes back when we first launched Smart Brevity in a large global organization where they used to just send articles, right? And someone overseas got this article and they're like, I don't know why I got this, right? But I got to read it. My boss sent it to me. We forced the what's new and the why it matters.

SPEAKER_01:Just those two words and the sentences of that explanation help the reader understand. Oh, okay, now I understand why I am getting this article, what's the point of it? Now I can read it and understand it withinstead of just like FYI. Here's the link. Oh my God. So many people just send you decks. I got that all the time. The worst I hate is like someone sends you an article and you're just like, okay, but why did you send this to me?

SPEAKER_00:What about internal meetings? Internal meetings are in general terrible. Almost all the internal meetings, including board meetings, including all the internal meetings and board meetings I've personally run. Um, they're all bad. How would you advise somebody like me to run better internal meetings?

SPEAKER_01:On meetings, your instincts are definitely right. Uh, there was a recent study called Super Teams. There's a new book called Super Teams. I wish we'd had this data before we published our book, but it just came out. And they basically looked at average teams versus teams that were exceptional in terms of their productivity. And what they found was an average team had 18 hours of meetings, 11 hours of communication, that being email or uh Slack or text messages.

SPEAKER_01:And so if you think about that, that only leaves like a day, day and a half to actually get some work. The really good teams, the super teens, what they did is they had less standing meetings. They didn't have these reoccurring meetings every week that were an hour long. They only set meetings when they had to. And when they did, they were very clear about a few things. Like one, there was always an agenda. Two, there was always an outcome that was stated.

SPEAKER_00:Okay, we're meeting because we're trying to figure this specific thing out. We're trying to decide should we invest in this company or not invest in this company or something like that.

SPEAKER_01:They also had the smallest number of people in the meeting. And so that's something that's really difficult actually in a large.

SPEAKER_00:Not everyone needs to be in this meeting, right? Okay, you're you're not uh and by the way, like often, like sometimes you're too high to be in this meeting, sometimes you're too low to be in this meeting. Let's get the right Goldilocks people there.

SPEAKER_01:It tends to be an ego issue. And so this is something that I think has to start at the top. Like the CEO has to make it okay that they are not in every meeting, that the people that report to them are not in every meeting. Like it gets to be something where it's like, why am I not in that meeting? You got to avoid that because then you end up with these 20, 30 person meetings.

SPEAKER_00:I'm so happy when I don't get invited to meetings. Like, I'm like, hey, can I take myself off this meeting? But like, you know, you know, oh, you know, it'll look bad if you don't show up to the meeting. Like, can I get my avatar to show? Like, I don't I don't know what's going on here.

SPEAKER_01:Well, it just has to become a norm that that that you actually set up the fewest number of people that are needed in order to make the decision. A meeting should only really take place if you need to make the decision.

SPEAKER_00:And maybe if you have a recurring meeting, like, okay, let's cancel it the day before if there's nothing too important to do or something.

SPEAKER_01:The best advice in the book uh that we talk about, and this is look, you can only do this if you're a leader of an organization. We call it meeting bankruptcy, right? Where you just twice a year, you just say, okay, we're wiping out all of the meetings and we're starting new. All the recurring meetings are gone, and we'll add them back as needed. But there's rules. If you add them back, you have to have an agenda, you have to have an outcome, and you have to review all the people that are in it.

SPEAKER_01:And so that way, as they get added back, they are applying, they they already have those rules set in.

SPEAKER_00:I mean, you you've got this system of like which is like confront, delete, amplify, like first of all, walk us through those and then which of those is the hardest?

SPEAKER_01:Yeah. So confront is why am I doing this? So we'll just take meetings. We're talking about meetings. Should this meeting even happen? Who's in the meeting? Why is this meeting happening? What's the outcome that I want to get? A lot of people don't confront that when it comes to goals or purpose or other things in their life. And so we basically say you've got to confront these things that take up your time. So look at what's eating up your time. Confront, is this a good use of my time?

SPEAKER_01:Should I be doing it at all? That's the confront piece. Delete. Now you can actually start to remove things that don't matter. This I would say is the hardest part because humans don't like to say no. They don't like to say no to coffee or drinks off the wood. They don't like to say no to events, they don't like to say no to going to a meeting. And so that becomes the hardest part. We empower you to say no by going through an exercise where we say, okay, let's make sure we understand what are the three things you're trying to achieve this month, this year, this quarter, whatever it may be.

SPEAKER_01:And if it doesn't align with that, then you can say no. And by the way, you kind of have to do it in your work and your personal life because things like, oh, let's grab a drink after work, you are inclined to say yes to that. But then it eats into you being a good husband, you being a good dad, which then makes you a worse performer also at work. So getting your priorities straight is really important.

SPEAKER_00:Let's say there's something at home, but it's like you don't feel it's that that important to do. Maybe um, I don't know, it's uh go to some random school meeting or something, but like your spouse thinks it's really important to do. Like, how do you have that conversation with them about it?

SPEAKER_01:Well, one of the things, it's a little morbid, but in the book we say, okay, imagine you're on your deathbed and you're trying to think about, well, what are the things that I will be remembered for? And and we try and put everything in rules of three. We talk a lot about like why the rule of three is important. So, like, what are the three things you want to be known for? Most people, it's pretty clear. It's like, I want to be a good husband, I want to be a good dad, I want to be a good friend, right?

SPEAKER_01:I don't want to be relationships matter to me. Two, I want something in purpose in my life, right? My work has to serve a purpose of some kind. And three, usually has to do with like your health, your well-being, longevity, uh, something of that nature. If you really understand those things, then you can start applying it to each one. Okay, what does it mean to be a good husband or a good father or, you know, a good friend, right? And then is that the time that I want to spend?

SPEAKER_01:So what I would say in that situation is, well, if I go to that school meeting, it's actually also an hour I can't spend with my kids.

SPEAKER_00:That's right. That's all that's exactly. You're literally sacrificing the time with your kids to go to the school meeting. So you have to decide what's more important than that or the other thing. You can't do both.

SPEAKER_01:And then the last one is amplify. Sorry, we got uh, but it was confront, delete, amplify. The last one's the most fun one, right? Because once you have deleted and you've created the space, now you can focus on the areas that really matter. Either they really matter because you're really good at them, they're a strength reviewers, and you should be doing more of that, or it really matters because you've, you know, thought about it and it's part of your purpose, right?

SPEAKER_01:Again, being a good dad, being a good father, being a good, uh, you know, leaving a mark on the world, whatever it may be. You've actually thought through it and you're now applying that found time to that. If you don't do that, by the way, time will get filled, right? It will get filled with nonsense, right? And that's just the human condition. So you've got to actually like have those priorities and then use that time to amplify the things that matter.

SPEAKER_00:As like we're using voice more. I'm using voice a lot more to communicate. So I'll kind of like talk into it and then it converts into text and it'll put that in an email or Slack or whatever. But whenever I use my voice, it's more verbose than if I was just typing it up. So it's good for me because I can get it out quickly, but it's bad for the person I'm sending to because they are have to read more information. Can you see a scenario where, like, okay, people can use a voice, but then there's like something at the end of it that then can consolidates that in a smart brevity thing before it sends out?

SPEAKER_01:I firmly believe in this. We've developed that software, by the way. We have smart brevity software that the companies use to help turn communications into something that is more concise. It's not as simple as it sounds. Like you have to first teach editorial judgment to people. Ultimately, humans have to make decisions about what's important. You have to be really clear about what is the idea you're trying to convey, who's the audience you're trying to convey that to.

SPEAKER_01:If you don't have those things sorted out, you will just end up with like a lot of words because you haven't like cleared your mind, right? You haven't, you, you don't have a focused mind, therefore you don't, your output is not focused.

SPEAKER_00:As we interact more and more with AIs, we're reading information from AIs, we're speaking to AIs, where uh a lot of what we do on a day-to-day is communicating with AIs, either to AIs or from AIs. How should we be thinking about both the simplify world and the smart brevity world in the new age of AIs?

SPEAKER_01:Well, so there's a downside and an upside, right? The downside is at this moment in time, AI is actually a complexity machine, right? Which model should I use? What query should I put in? A lot of companies are struggling with well, how do I use this? And actually, right now it's probably eating up more time than it's actually saving for a lot of companies. No, not everyone. There are ways to use AI that will do the opposite, that will save you time.

SPEAKER_01:And actually, in the book, I, you know, what I love about this book is it's probably the first book where you read it, you want to start exercising those habits, right? Changing those things, making, making a difference. And in the past, it's always been well, you've got to be disciplined, you've got to be strong. Um, we probably, you know, a bunch of people that are listening right now have read Atomic Habits, right? And then they're like, I'm gonna change my life, right?

SPEAKER_01:Yeah. And then you go and you try and implement it, and it just fails. So AI can actually hold your hand and hold your feet to the fire on this. And so, as an example, I'll go back to meetings because one that everyone can understand. We have uh QR code in the book that you can scan. When you scan it, it will open up a page with all of the prompt engineering related to areas in the book. And so one of them is this meeting audit that we ask you to run.

SPEAKER_01:You know, you can run it once a month, once a quarter, where we basically say, what are the goals you're trying to achieve this quarter? Run it against all the meetings, right? You have to connect it obviously to your calendar. Run it against your meeting. And then tell me what percentage of my time is actually spent in meetings that are related to these goals. And I just ran mine, I can tell you it's 50%, and I'm obsessed with this, right? Yeah, it's it's really it's unbelievable how much time we don't spend on the goals that we've written down and said are important.

SPEAKER_01:And so you can actually start to use AI, you can tell it, and the prompt engineering is there to say, hey, I want you to act as my chief of staff, my chief simplicity officer. I want you to review my calendar every month and come back and help me delete the meetings that don't matter or are not aligned with the goals that I've set.

SPEAKER_00:I have like my agent that helps me with my meetings, and of course it does like helps me with my follow-ups and all the other types of things to do the meetings. But one of the things it does is it just says, hey, rate this meeting on how useful it was to you from one to four. And that could be um maybe uh I'm playing pickleball with Roy. Maybe that's a four. But it could be, yeah, it could be some internal meeting that that I have, and maybe that meeting was a one.

SPEAKER_00:It was like, oh, this was terrible, huge waste of time, or somebody who asked me for advice. It just like didn't actually work out, or you know, whatever it might be wasn't, or I didn't prepare for the meeting and I I didn't get much out of it, or whatever else it might be. And then it just like it uses that one to four ranking to lead to help me also say, hey, these internal meetings, like you're always putting a one or two. Like, why are you doing this?

SPEAKER_00:You know, why are you doing this to yourself? It's like, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Good point. Like, so it's kind of helping me kind of like delete some of these things I don't need to do.

SPEAKER_01:Well, not everyone can afford an executive coach. Everyone has a free executive coach in their pocket now. You just have to, yeah, you just have to train it. You just have to put the prompts in there correctly, but you can engineer the best executive coach possible that is also actually connected to your email, connected to your calendar, connected to your Slack, and is able to actually say you are or are not using your time effectively.

SPEAKER_00:Your new book, I would say the scariest line in your book, you may maybe there are other scary lines, is that you you basically say AI might simplify you out of a job. What did you mean by that?

SPEAKER_01:The reason that we wrote the book at this moment in time is that we feel like we are already drowning in information. There's too much coming at us. Like you and I are people that read a lot of news, a lot of articles, listen to a lot of podcasts. We want to be informed. I don't know if you feel the same way, but I can't keep up anymore. It's really, really hard. There's too much information out there. That feeling is only going to get more and more intense.

SPEAKER_01:And so we believe that the people that do best, the companies that do best, will be the ones that simplify everything else. What are they trying to achieve? What are they focused on? If you simplify those other things, then you've removed a lot of the decision fatigue that happens naturally in the course of a day, a month, a year because you're not as overwhelmed by the things that you can control. And so that's a big reason why we wrote it. That line in particular is actually more to do with don't be average at anything.

SPEAKER_01:Average has no value anymore. And so what we say in the book is that we we're sort of using simplify, that confront, delete, amplified concept to get you to amplify the things that you're really good at because we believe that that is what's going to make the human difference. You being exceptional at the things that you're really strong at. And that if you just become average at a bunch of stuff, AI is going to eat that up all day.

SPEAKER_00:It's as you're saying when I use Claude or something, it has uh it basically has some options of how they relay information back to you. And, you know, it's got a okay, we can compact the information, we can do normal. And there's actually weirdly a verbose, it actually is called verbose option. I can't imagine anyone, I would love to get like the the stats from Anthropic, but I I doubt like they have more than 0.1% of people in the world that ever click the verbose.

SPEAKER_00:And maybe it's just to trick them to just like put normal or something uh in there or you know that that that's out there. Well, I don't know if if you find the same thing. I find that AI is very verbose. It is very verbose, yeah. You know, when I say I wouldn't want to say like be as brief as possible, it's still like like shooting out all this random information that I don't need.

SPEAKER_01:It is extremely verbose. And and the problem with that is that the outputs, so then the presentations that people make, the reports that people write, the emails that people draw, they're all longer. And they feel great about it because they're like, oh, I sound so smart. No, it's a problem. You've created AI slop. You've created something that maybe shouldn't have been written in the first place, but now it's twice as long as well.

SPEAKER_00:There's a premise that people just waste years doing needless stuff and could be like out of habit, out of inertia. Like, what are what are some like basic things you see like smart people or or good people just stop doing?

SPEAKER_01:You know, we talk about this, but there there is this move to be well-rounded, right? There's this move to be well-rounded, especially when you're earlier in your career. And so people are wasting a lot of time trying to be average of something.

SPEAKER_00:Yeah, they're trying to go from bad to mediocre many times, right? Instead of going from good to great. Exactly.

SPEAKER_01:And and there probably in the past, if you were in a corporate setting, there may have been some need for that. We believe that time is dead. Like that need is gone. And so understanding your strengths and then focusing on your strengths is the best use of time.

SPEAKER_00:There may be something you have that is absolutely debilitating that you have to go address, right? So, like obviously, if you're uh if if someone's a heroin addict or something like that, okay, like stop being a heroin addict. I don't know if I'd call that a weakness. Yeah, yeah, that's that's also like if you have this like huge problem. Okay, great, stop being a heroin addict. But like, you know, it's like, but you have other people who are just like, they're late to meetings, right?

SPEAKER_00:It's like ignoring, make it ignores their colleagues. Okay, they're they're they're late to meetings. Yeah, it's a fault, but like, yeah, maybe you can get better at that. But like, you know, if you go from good to great, there's probably a lot more gains from the going from good to great.

SPEAKER_01:Yeah, the the other thing I would say is default versus design, right? So many companies, there are things in place, rules, procedures, but you know, if the bureaucracy of an organization, we call them barnacles in the book, but it's all things that were done by default. And you're not exactly sure why they are the way they are, but they're all done by default. Everything in an organization should be by design. Everything should be by design. And so that is the confront part that people should go back and look at in a world.

SPEAKER_00:Where people are focusing on their strengths instead of going from like bad to mediocre on things, then that you're just gonna have a lot more people in organizations that are bad at stuff. Um, they don't get to that mediocre, which might like make some of their colleagues upset, or you know, it's it's like how do you design an organization where you have you're essentially gonna have more people that are bad at things?

SPEAKER_01:I don't know if I'd look at it that way. I think that a lot of things are gonna get automated. A great example. I think this has been a revolutionary change for salespeople, right? Salespeople like to sell, they like to close, they hate the follow-up, they hate the research, right? Yeah. AI has done an amazing job. Amazing job. Yeah. All the research done for you, all the follow-up done for you, no more meeting notes. It does it all for you. It has the transcripts, right?

SPEAKER_01:That's what I mean by focus on the strengths. Like the thing is that I hated as a salesperson. It took up probably two-thirds of the time, right? I I wasn't in sales meetings all the time. Two-thirds of my time was research and follow-up. Now you can remove all of that and you can be focused on selling and you can spend all day closing deals.

SPEAKER_00:Even if they are bad at something, you could probably put AI can help you put some sort of guard guardrails on it. Like, hey, start annoying me if I am not giving doing this or I'm not getting back to someone on time, or you know, whatever it might be, or if I'm not getting this thing done, like start start annoying, you know, whatever it is. Like, and you might not feel as bad if the AI is annoying you rather than like your boss or your colleagues are annoying you.

SPEAKER_00:Better to get the AI to ping you before your boss, for sure. There's something about subtraction that is just hard for people to get their head around, right? Like, I think we are we are kind of people like addition, and we're always, you know, oh, I'm gonna learn this new thing and do this new thing. It's it's like rather than like, hey, I gotta unlearn this thing. Yeah, it's like a whole different like, what about humans that makes it like hard for us to like embrace subtraction?

SPEAKER_01:We talk about this in the book. We're hardwired for this, right? I think it goes back to caveman days where the more shelter, the more food, the more you could get, right, the better off you were. And I think it's very hard for us to get out of that mindset. So we always want more, more money, more meetings, more friends, more follows, more likes. Like you can see it in nearly all parts of human behavior. We keep at it, right? Um, we we talk in the book about, you know, people using uh, you know, storage rooms, right?

SPEAKER_01:You know, where they're like hoarding a bunch of stuff that they never used. Yeah, exactly. Storage facilities, yeah. You just like what why do I have all this stuff? Yeah. And so it's a it's a human condition that we actively have to fight against where we say, actually, no, more isn't isn't better.

SPEAKER_00:I used to have these goals in life that I wanted to accomplish. For instance, like I wanted to write a novel. Uh and so I'd like to keep notes always about like I have probably had like four different notes on different novels I would keep notes on over the years. And but like there was never a year where writing a novel was in my top 20 priorities. Uh literally, it's never happened. And then finally, one year I just said to myself, I am never ever gonna write a novel.

SPEAKER_00:And it was this like weird freeing thing, like all of a sudden I didn't have to keep notes anymore. It just didn't take the headspace. Of course, I could like change my mind at some point if I choose to, but it would something about saying never, like literally that word never, like it gave me all this extra freedom.

SPEAKER_01:Well, you focused in, right? And that that's a big part about what we talk about in the book, right? You you said this isn't make my top 20 lists. I'm gonna narrow down my focus. And that clarity, it's kind of like when you uh open that that vest draw that we all have that just has odds and ends in it, and you clean it out, that feeling when you're done and you've cleaned it out.

SPEAKER_00:Yeah, you've got this old cord that hasn't worked since like 1997. Yes, why do I have this? Okay, you you built Axios, sold it for$525 million. Media is like a famously brutal business. How what did you figure out about making money in media that most outlets just never can figure out?

SPEAKER_01:So media is incredibly competitive, it is ruthlessly brutal. And unless you know the niche audience that you're trying to reach, and this was not always clear, right? You go back to, you know, Vice and Vox and BuzzFeed and a lot of general news category or general entertainment category, like those days are behind us.

SPEAKER_00:They were more B2C, and weirdly, like political and access were kind of more B2B, even though people don't think of it that way.

SPEAKER_01:We were aimed at the influencers, right? And so those influencers could have been on Capitol Hill, they could have been executives, but it was really aimed at people that needed information to do their job. And so it wasn't a casual reader of news. If we got you, great, like it doesn't hurt us, but the business model was built around this uh group of people that needed information to do their job. And and that's why Smart Brevity paid off for us because they needed to get in and out quickly, right?

SPEAKER_01:Yes, they weren't interested. They're not this save the Atlantic read for the weekend, right? Like I'm at work, I need to understand what just happened, and I need to read it. I gotta grok this thing right away. Yes, yes. And so um, that was our niche. That's what we focus in on. And I would say the other thing is we said, okay, we are audience first, and we're gonna worry about monetization later. And I don't mean like later as in like we'll put it off and one day we'll make money, but it was secondary to serving the audience.

SPEAKER_01:And I think a lot of media ended up making sacrifices, putting efforts. Weird ads that would pop up and annoy the crap out of people, and that became an issue. So they didn't know their audience, it was too broad, therefore very replaceable. And then they annoyed their audience by dumping in a bunch of ads. It is a very difficult space. We've been very, I think, uh thoughtful in how we went about it, and we focused on this influencer niche and it and it really paid off.

SPEAKER_01:How important is events in media? Influencer niche, very important. So we do about 200 events a year. Um, we do events all over the world, and it's really about your ability to curate a great event, right? Bring together thought leaders, bring together a great audience, make it memorable so that people want to both participate and, you know, um be, you know, be in the event, either as an audience member or on stage. And so Axios has a great reputation of putting on incredible events.

SPEAKER_01:So we get the best guests, we get the best audience, we're able to have a wait list for all of our events. And those events, um, because they are usually paid for by a sponsor of some kind, make money. And so that allows us to create great journalism because we have these great guests that are breaking news.

SPEAKER_00:The events themselves are like news producing things. They have to be in our category.

SPEAKER_01:They have to be. In your category, yeah.

SPEAKER_00:And the people who go feel like, oh, they're getting some exclusive thing because it's that's capped at a certain number of people can go to these things.

SPEAKER_01:Well, and they're seeing news being made, right? Like our reporters are on stage actively trying to break news, right? The people who are coming know that they have an opportunity to make news. And so it's happening right in front of them. So that's kind of a really interesting thing for the audience.

SPEAKER_00:There's something about live where you know the the it's almost like an anti-AI play, right? Like Taylor Swift or the NFL, like these are things that people all as they have more money, they're gonna they're gonna go to, they're gonna go see, they're gonna go engage with, um, they're gonna go talk to their friends about. And yeah, you could go, you know, see an NFL game from three weeks ago or something, but that's just not as exciting as seeing something like actually happening right now.

SPEAKER_01:Obviously, post-COVID, there was this huge boom in real events taking place. And there was a lot of venture money that went into event-related businesses. And then there was this real concern that it was a bubble of some kind, right? That that there would be like this fall off. But I actually think that in the age of AI, that human interaction is gonna be more important than ever. And so I think events will continue gaining traction. I think people will want and seek out these real life experiences.

SPEAKER_01:And so uh our business has grown tremendously over the last few years. And I I don't see that stopping. I think people are gonna want that experience.

SPEAKER_00:You have two other co-founders, one of which Mike Allen is is an extremely special guy. He just seems like he works harder than anybody else in Washington. Can you give us a sense of like, and he just seems like he's constantly breaking news, like literally every day? Like, give me a sense of what it is to work with someone like that.

SPEAKER_01:Mike is is truly unique. He's probably the well most well connected reporter in the world.

SPEAKER_00:How many people do you think he texts every day? Like, I get a text from him like every other week, just a random text about something. Like, this guy must be texting thousands of people a day. If you email him, he will email you right back. Oh, yeah, that's his superpower. He is, he's an incredibly, he's incredibly fast at getting back to people. That's like that actually is his business model in some ways. He just gets back to people super fast.

SPEAKER_00:But he's genuine.

SPEAKER_01:He really cares about people. He cares about your story, he remembers your story. He he does wake up extremely early, as does Jip. Like they are like super early risers. They're immediately on the phone with each other, they're talking about news, they're talking about some development that's happening. So I will say, like, they live and breathe this. These are Jim and Mike are dedicated news people. They absolutely love it. And they, you know, that when you talk to Mike, he'll say he's living the dream.

SPEAKER_01:Like, this is what he wants to do, this is what he enjoys. So work and life to him are very blended in a good way, where you know, he's enjoying himself.

SPEAKER_00:Now, you guys sold to Cox, which obviously is a great company and they're a great steward of the brand, but why why not just stay independent and just keep building?

SPEAKER_01:So we wanted to build this company that it would outlast us. It was really important to us that that Axios and what we've built here, and as we continue to build, we're in 40 cities right now. We're trying to expand uh in Axios local into more cities. We wanted this business to outlive us. And so, you know, you're talking about me, Jim, and Mike, right? As founders, right? It's a very founder-led business. And even though we sold three years ago, we're still in the business, we still run the business.

SPEAKER_01:Nothing actually changed. You know, we have quarterly board meetings, but we had that before. Um, you know, Cox is very hands-off in terms of letting us grow the business. They're very much believers in our strategy. And if anything, they act, I think, as great board members, you know, help us, you know, fine-tune the strategy. And they, in addition to that, help us invest in the business. And so we wanted uh a large organization that had been around for a long time that understood the editorial line, if you will, like what like what they can and cannot interfere with.

SPEAKER_01:And Cox started in media, right? They started in newspapers and uh they're a fifth-generation family-owned business that is extremely profitable. And so they were in a great situation to help us continue this business, even when we're long off.

SPEAKER_00:You've been in the Washington, D.C. tech scene for a long time. And some people think that's like an oxymoron. Like, give us a sense about like the tech scene in the DC area.

SPEAKER_01:I was also one of the early uh founders of K Street Capital, which was like a DC, uh, it still is. Uh it's a DC group of angel investors where we look for investments in companies that are either going to be heavily regulated or or are policy expertise um or network can be can be helpful. When we started, I think there was like less than a dozen people at that table, right? I think now it has about a hundred members, but it was very niche. And I think the entire DC tech community has been very niche for for a long time.

SPEAKER_00:Though, like in the in the early 90s, like it was booming, right? We had AOL, we had all these kind of like companies, the networking companies and stuff like that that were huge.

SPEAKER_01:There was a handful, but it was never like Silicon Valley, it was never like New York. Like it was, it was, it has certain certain niche to it. But I feel like now that is broadening. Like as people moved around post-COVID, we got a lot of people like yourself who, you know, have this background from California, are able to bring that mindset. Like it's super helpful.

SPEAKER_00:Right. A few personal questions. Okay, why is pickleball the most fun sport in the world? You and I play pickleball. What do you what do you like about it? I also race cars and the pictures behind me, right? And very different. Pickleball and racing cars are very different.

SPEAKER_01:Well, I think I told you this story, right? I, you know, if you would have asked me, like, what's my most favorite thing in the world? I would say, oh, racing cars. Nothing beats racing cars. And I went to this track and I was there for three days, racing cars, having the time of my life. I was I was in a Ferrari, so it was like really an exceptional experience. And after the track day, we would play pickleball.

SPEAKER_00:You're like basically on track doing track for four or five hours, and then okay, eat some lunch, and then like you go play some pickleball in the afternoon or something. Exactly.

SPEAKER_01:And I realized at the end of that day, I was like, I like pickable better than I like being on track.

SPEAKER_00:You could never think I would have believed a little uh less uh expensive too, yeah.

SPEAKER_01:A lot less expensive, a lot easier. Like I think it has to do with the social component, right? You're working out, but you're also having a conversation. There's natural uh time to get together. I love it when you're playing with a partner and you're switching off. So you're interacting, you're meeting people, you're getting your social time, but you're also working out. Like it makes it the perfect sort of way to spend time.

SPEAKER_00:Two more questions we ask all of our guests. How are you personally using AI day to day, either for like work or personal life? That's like maybe interesting.

SPEAKER_01:My favorite thing is when I connected AI to my calendar and to my email. Because now finding information is incredibly easy. It used to take me forever. I was just so frustrated looking for an email or looking for a file. So much easier now to find information.

SPEAKER_00:Why is Google not able to do that? Like, if you obviously, like you probably already have your email and your calendar on Google. Yet if you point Gemini to it and you say, hey, you know, whatever, tell me this thing about my calendar, it like it literally is terrible. It just cannot do it. Whereas if you point Claude or OpenAI on it, it does a great job. Why do you think, why do you think Google cannot get out of its head? Like obviously they're a smart company.

SPEAKER_00:Like you could actually do this with an open source model. So it's not like the they don't have the models to do it. Like literally, you could do it with an off-the-shelf, off-the- open source model will work great. Like, why have they not got their act together?

SPEAKER_01:They're so complex.

SPEAKER_00:They're so yeah, it's one of those things like this thing, or is it just like they're just too big of a company at this point? And I think they're too big.

SPEAKER_01:I think they're too big to be able to fix that specific problem. That problem, by the way, that we're talking about probably doesn't matter today. It's not on their radar right now. Like the biggest thing on their radar, which is by the way, going to be the biggest topic for the next, I don't know, year, is gonna be search is dead, right? Websites are dead.

SPEAKER_00:They have this amazing store of personal information for all of us, our email, our calendar, you know, all those other like interactions that they have there, which are like incredible. If you're going to connect that store to somebody else, like now that other, whether it's like let's say OpenAI, Anthropic, whoever you're connecting it to, now that or or one of these agents that could, you know, work on your behalf, like Town or Instinct or something.

SPEAKER_00:Now all of a sudden, like Google is getting disintermediated. They're just like a dumb store of value.

SPEAKER_01:I'll be a counter to that, Arn. I actually think that Google is focused on the right thing right now, which is the AI Gemini answers when you do a search. Like that, what what they're doing, they have to, they have to rescue the search business.

SPEAKER_00:Google is a massive company with so many smart people. They can do both. Like doing the doing the pointing an AI at your calendar. Literally, I could go to Google today, and by the end of the day today, I could ship that product. It's that easy to do. There is no excuse for Google not doing it. It is, I think it's actually like a destruction of shareholder value, like that I've never seen before, that they haven't done it. Like it is so easy for them to do, yet they somehow choose.

SPEAKER_00:I think there's some lawyer there or I don't know, somebody who just decided not to do it. Like it is obviously something like their consumers want.

SPEAKER_01:There is a little bit of a creepy factor, right? Because Google does actually know so much about you that if you were doing something like when when OpenAI and Claude tell you, oh, is this because of this thing that you told me about? And you're like, Yes, that is, yeah, you connected these dots. You get excited about it. If Google did it in my email, I think I would be creeped out. Oh, is this why you were searching for this product? Right.

SPEAKER_00:Like that, you'd have to be careful because to your point, they do know all of that. That's interesting. All right. Last question we ask all of our guests what conventional wisdom or advice do you think is generally bad advice?

SPEAKER_01:Yeah, I'm I'm gonna go back to that well-rounded piece. Like, how many years did we spend hearing from people? You've got to be well-rounded, you've got to fix these wick weaknesses that you have. Like, think about the entire feedback loop within a corporation. It's all weakness focus, right? Whereas the moment that you start focusing on your strength, focusing on the things that you're good at, it makes you happier too. Like I enjoy my work more because I focus my time in the areas that I'm really good at.

SPEAKER_01:Therefore, I have more success. Therefore, I am better at it, therefore I spend more time on it. And so that is the loop that you want to uh fixate on. And I think too many people are still focused on this well-rounded piece. Too much feedback within a corporation is about fixing your weakness. Like, no, find that area that you're passionate about and that you're really good at and spend more time doing that. You will see that you will become exceptional at.

SPEAKER_00:That starts early, starts in, you know, we have kids in school, both of us have kids in school. Like it starts at a very, very early age. Well, you gotta get, you know, you gotta get better at this thing.

SPEAKER_01:I get this question from both my kids. Like, why am I doing this? Like they, I think they're way smarter than we were. Like, I remember that thought running through my head, but but I, you know, I didn't express it. Like both my kids are like, I don't understand why I'm learning this. I'm never gonna use this in my life.

SPEAKER_00:And I'm not passionate about it. It's one thing if I'm passionate about it or you know, whatever it might be.

SPEAKER_01:Yeah, I think it's our job, uh, you know, in the in in when it comes to our kids, exposing them to a lot of different things so that we can see what they like and what they don't like. But once you figure out that they really like something, let them go at it. And the same uh, you know, at work. Like we gotta stop, you know, trying to get everyone to be average at everything. Like, no, like even when you are starting out in your career, if you start noticing you're really good at something or you just enjoy that thing, you gravitate towards it, spend more time there.

SPEAKER_01:That that's where you're gonna be exceptional.

SPEAKER_00:There's certain things like that schools, at least schools in the US, are very good at. Like they're probably very good at like teaching you basic math or something, whatever. Yeah, and maybe they're not, like, I don't know. And there's certain things that I'm clearly not good at. Like they're clearly not good at teaching languages. Like it is just like almost every student who even students who had like an eight-year language requirement, come out like not knowing anything except English.

SPEAKER_01:Well, I actually I know some of the reason that that's happening because I really, I, I was, I was really curious about this when my son was taking multiple languages and learned nothing. And it's because you have to, and in fact, I I I actually try to go to the school and like get this change, you have to learn to read and write in that language. And I'm like, no, like I want my kid to speak it. Like whether you can read or write, it does make does not matter to me.

SPEAKER_01:Like if my kid could speak fluent Spanish, like the fact he can't read it, like that's not that's not important. I want to be able to speak it because then you can utilize it. And they won't allow that. Again, it goes to that well-roundedness thing. Like, my my son is in his fourth year now of a second language, and he can speak it, but he can't write or read a word of it, right?

SPEAKER_00:Well, that's the fact that he could speak it is amazing.

SPEAKER_01:I mean, that's all I because I I forced you folks to I I told him I was like, I don't care about your your reading and writing. I just want you to be able to speak it. And like I basically let him off the hook for the reading and writing portion.

SPEAKER_00:The school didn't bow. I mean, I took six years of French from seventh grade through twelfth grade, and like literally by the end of it, I could order Le Conard d'Orange at a restaurant and I could conjugate some verbs, and that was all I got out of six years. It was an absolute waste of time. Waste of time. Yeah, unbelievable. All right. Well, thank you, Roy Schwartz. This was not a waste of time. This was amazing. I love this. I love this podcast with you.

SPEAKER_00:Thank you, Roy Schwartz, for joining us on Summation. This was incredible. I encourage our listeners to both buy Smart Brevity and buy Simplify your new book as well.

SPEAKER_01:Thank you. And it comes out September 15th. You can get it at any of your favorite places Amazon, Barnes and Noble, wherever you want to order your book. And September 15th will probably be after this goes.

SPEAKER_00:So we'll be, it's probably already. Yeah, so it's available. It's already out. That's in the future. In the past, yes. Sounds good. Amazing. One more thing before we go. I read a blog called Summation. It's the same as this podcast. The blog is about non-obvious idea sharing on business, talent, data, longevity, and random contrarian takes. If you like the conversations on this show, you'll probably like the blog. It's free, new content comes out twice a month.

SPEAKER_00:You can subscribe at orange.substack.com. That's orange.substack.com.

Transcript supplied by the publisher with the episode.

Podcast

Summation with Auren Hoffman

Auren Hoffman · Business · English

Non-obvious ideas that move the world. Auren Hoffman hosts leaders across tech, business, markets, and government.  Summation is the permanent home for the relentlessly curious.  Auren is CEO of NQB8, GP at Flex Capital, Chairman of Dialog; former CEO of SafeGraph and LiveRamp (NYSE: RAMP).

More from Summation with Auren Hoffman All episodes →

  1. 29 Sep 2026 · 42 min

    Helion CEO David Kirtley on why fusion finally works

    David Kirtley is the co-founder and CEO of Helion Energy, the fusion company. Helion has raised more than $1.5 billion at a $15.5 billion valuation, and Sam Altman is its biggest investor and former chairman. Before fusion, David worked on rocket and space propulsion. In this episode of Summation, David and Auren discuss: Skipping the steam turbine and pulling electricity straight out of a starHow a Best Buy network card helped make fusion possibleRegulating a 150 million degree machine like ...

  2. 22 Sep 2026 · 1 hr 3 min

    Alex Rampell on why the best companies have hostages, not customers

    Alex Rampell is a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, where he leads the firm’s $2.7 billion Apps practice and has driven much of the firm's fintech investing, including Plaid, Mercury, and Opendoor. Before a16z, Alex co-founded multiple companies including Affirm (NASDAQ:AFRM), FraudEliminator (acquired by McAfee in 2006), Point, TrialPay (acquired by Visa in 2015), TXN (acquired by Envestnet in 2019), and Yub (acquired by Coupons.com in 2013). In this episode of Summation, Alex and Aure...

  3. 15 Sep 2026 · 1 hr 1 min

    Life360 founder Chris Hulls on existential amusement and why public markets kill bold bets

    Chris Hulls is the co-founder and executive chairman of Life360 ($LIF), the family safety and location-sharing app now worth over $5 billion. He was CEO for 17 years before stepping back last year. Before Life360, he served in the Air Force in Afghanistan. In this episode of Summation, Chris and Auren discuss: Why he took Life360 public in Australia and why he'd never run a public company againWhy "you want to sound smart, but not interesting" is the secret rule of corporate speakWhy nobody a...

  4. 8 Sep 2026 · 1 hr

    Felicis founder Aydin Senkut: why moats are dead and alive

    Aydin Senkut is the founder and managing partner of Felicis, the venture firm he started in 2006, with over $4B under management and early bets on Shopify, Notion, Canva, and Adyen. He was Google's first product manager and has been on the Forbes Midas list of top investors for 13 years running. In this episode of Summation, Aydin and Auren discuss: Why the best platform companies came from Ottawa, Sydney, and Amsterdam and not Silicon ValleyHow capital became a commodity and people are the o...

  5. 1 Sep 2026 · 1 hr 7 min

    Nir Eyal on belief, motivation, and the end of suffering

    Nir Eyal is the author of Hooked, which became Silicon Valley's playbook for building habit-forming products, Indistractable, on taking your attention back, and the new book Beyond Belief. He taught at Stanford's Graduate School of Business and is one of the sharpest thinkers on what to do with technology. In this episode of Summation, Nir and Auren discuss: Why to-do lists set you up to feel like a failure and what to do insteadWhy 90% of the time you check your phone, it's an uncomfortable ...

Take it with you

The Melo app keeps playing with the screen off, works in the car and on your watch, wakes you to your station, and browses the whole catalogue offline. Free, no ads, no account.

Get it on Google Play